4 ms·
If he slowed down the water so that it has a chance to pecolate, it might help. But that only expands the capacity, and there may be days when that overflows.
by hosh 3y ago
If he slowed down the water so that it has a chance to pecolate, it might help. But that only expands the capacity, and there may be days when that overflows.
I think Lancaster talks about the perpendicular flow, and also talks about ways to mitigate that with curves (as well as discussion about erosion patterns when water exits a structure too quickly, which in turn reshapes the terrain, sometimes going into degenerative erosion patterns). On-contour swales (or trenches) are good examples, especially when there are multiple tiers with overflow to increase the distance the water has to travel as it snakes back and forth across the contour and descends down a slope. There are multiple chances to slow down water and let it try to infiltrate.
In his latest edition, Landcaster talks about gambesons (retaining walls), which he used to advocate. But because of long-term erosion patterns, those can fail pretty quickly.
- hinkley 3y agoHe's in Wisconsin. He's not thinking about dry season farming. On the other hand, if you are thinking about dry season farming, the government is already 150 years ahead of you and may fine you for attempting to hold onto more water than what can safely percolate in a day or two.
- hosh 3y agoThat depends on the scale and the state. I doubt the government cared that much 150 years ago; it was more about claims on surface and ground water. These days, past a certain scale, you’d work with an engineer to plan it out and get the permits.