> The Nordic model begs to differ. Can you expand on that? Because as an outside observer it seems that the Nordic model is primarily propped up by public-own

> The Nordic model begs to differ. Can you expand on that? Because as an outside observer it seems that the Nordic model is primarily propped up by public-owned natural resource extraction enabling near-endless funding for universally available services and industry-wide (rather than company-wide) guarantees enforced by the unions, but nothing about the unions or their economic model drives their way to a better economy, rather they have the advantage of an external economic input unaffected by unions propping it all up.