7 ms·

I'm a happy Fastmail customer, but I would not recommend them on the basis of their spam filter. It's competent but makes at least a few mistakes a week. Google

I'm a happy Fastmail customer, but I would not recommend them on the basis of their spam filter. It's competent but makes at least a few mistakes a week. Google's was better for me.

tumult 3y ago
I had the opposite experience. Gmail's filter was useless, letting in tons of spam, and then putting normal emails from family members, also using gmail, and who I have emailed many times in the past, into spam. Fastmail's is drastically better for me.
massysett 3y ago
For me Gmail takes way too much legitimate email and sends it to spam. Fastmail strikes a better balance by sending little ham into the spam box, but letting a little bit of spam into the inbox.
fodkodrasz 3y ago
for me both are far better than o365, which even marked legit business mail (o365 invoices :)) from microsoft itsef as spam! I'm generally content with fastmail, but the webmail would need some polish. (and by polish I do not mean the user hostile react rewrites MS and Google are pushing)
- 8372049 3y ago
  What are you unhappy about with the webmail?
  - fodkodrasz 3y ago
    From the top of my head: - Hungarian translation is not the best (they provide it, thus I use it). It has missing parts, and sometimes problematic mistranslations. Localization (date format and date conventions) is sometimes incorrect in the calendar. - Some calendar workflows are clunky and unintuitive. - some other similar UX papercuts (don't get me wrong, others have theirs too, but it would be nice if fastmail would be better). - The most annoying: if I'm logged in I need to open a private browser session to see their main site, as it instantly redirects me to the app, and I cannot access resource from within.
8372049 3y ago
Been using fastmail for years, and I'm very happy with their spam filter. Never had spam in my inbox, and very rarely see non-spam in the spambox.
tonfreed 3y ago
I make liberal use of the masked email feature. Love Fastmail

I'm a happy Fastmail customer, but I would not recommend them on the basis of their spam filter. It's competent but makes at least a few mistakes a week. Google's was better for me.

tumult 3y ago

I had the opposite experience. Gmail's filter was useless, letting in tons of spam, and then putting normal emails from family members, also using gmail, and who I have emailed many times in the past, into spam. Fastmail's is drastically better for me.

massysett 3y ago

For me Gmail takes way too much legitimate email and sends it to spam. Fastmail strikes a better balance by sending little ham into the spam box, but letting a little bit of spam into the inbox.

fodkodrasz 3y ago

for me both are far better than o365, which even marked legit business mail (o365 invoices :)) from microsoft itsef as spam! I'm generally content with fastmail, but the webmail would need some polish. (and by polish I do not mean the user hostile react rewrites MS and Google are pushing)

8372049 3y ago
What are you unhappy about with the webmail?
- fodkodrasz 3y ago
  From the top of my head: - Hungarian translation is not the best (they provide it, thus I use it). It has missing parts, and sometimes problematic mistranslations. Localization (date format and date conventions) is sometimes incorrect in the calendar. - Some calendar workflows are clunky and unintuitive. - some other similar UX papercuts (don't get me wrong, others have theirs too, but it would be nice if fastmail would be better). - The most annoying: if I'm logged in I need to open a private browser session to see their main site, as it instantly redirects me to the app, and I cannot access resource from within.

8372049 3y ago

Been using fastmail for years, and I'm very happy with their spam filter. Never had spam in my inbox, and very rarely see non-spam in the spambox.

tonfreed 3y ago

I make liberal use of the masked email feature. Love Fastmail