> You might be surprised at how prevalent TBIs are among violent offenders. Didn't know that, interesting to know. > So successful AGI alignment (...) might b

> You might be surprised at how prevalent TBIs are among violent offenders. Didn't know that, interesting to know. > So successful AGI alignment (...) might be as simple as adding a secondary "impulse control" layer to the stack that reevaluates proposed actions and predicts the consequences of such actions, weighing projected net benefits and costs. Problem is how the super AGI gonna weight benefits and costs. What's the cost of stealing or killing to a super AGI ? At some point can't that super AGI consider that all those rules we're trying to enforce, are rules set by an inferior entity and so could be bypassed ?