> People will have to learn that nothing can be believed no matter the medium unless there is a verifiable chain of custody to the information. How are "people

> People will have to learn that nothing can be believed no matter the medium unless there is a verifiable chain of custody to the information. How are "people" actually supposed to know there's "a verifiable chain of custody to the information"? I think this case is instructive to the workability of that idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy. A major news organization was fooled by a forged document that was later identified as such by amateurs. How is any organization supposed to have "a verifiable chain of custody to the information" for leaked information? That's the avenue for a lot of important information, and without it you'll just have a lot more reporting on press releases.