3 ms·
No, in both cases, use something that is better than JPEG and Webp: JPEG XL.
by LeoNatan25 3y ago
No, in both cases, use something that is better than JPEG and Webp: JPEG XL.
- _fat_santa 3y agoJPEG XL is great except is has virtually no browser support[1] [1]: https://caniuse.com/jpegxl https://caniuse.com/jpegxl
- qingcharles 3y agoJPEG XL is clearly superior in almost all contexts, but Google killed it and then Apple is trying to support it now. Unless Google reverses its stance though it will stay dead.
- aidenn0 3y agoThe thing that I like the best about jxl is how consistent the reference encoder is. If I need to compress an entire directory of images, cxjl -d 1.0 will generate good looking images at a pretty darn small size. Using mozjpeg (SPEG), or openjpeg (JPEG 2000) or cwebp, and I want to get even close (in bpp) to what cjxl does on the default I have to use different settings for b&w vs color and line-art vs photos.