4 ms·
It's not, it's just that people who spend thousands of dollars and hours into photography are more susceptible to care. Same with music, most people are fine wi
by lm28469 3y ago
It's not, it's just that people who spend thousands of dollars and hours into photography are more susceptible to care. Same with music, most people are fine with $15 earphones while musicians or music enthusiasts will find them disgusting.
- bawolff 3y agoMusic is probably a bad example of your point, as that field is famous for audiophiles insisting they can hear a difference for various things only for them not being able to tell the difference in a double blind test.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- lm28469 3y agoIt's more like 64kbs vs 128kbps than copper vs gold cables if you want to keep the analogy
- dagw 3y agoJust because there are some 'extreme' weirdos in the audiophile space, doesn't mean that there is no difference between cheap and expensive equipment. While people might not be able to tell the difference between $50 and $5000 speaker cables, anybody will be able to the hear the difference between $50 and $5000 speakers.