3 ms·

Too snarky to be insightful. Can you solve it better

• jimmywetnips 3y ago
  No, I really think the author himself was thinking he would get a lot more out of it, otherwise he would've have buried the result all the way at the end of a giant wall of text. In a way we all solved it better by not doing anything at all. Which doesn't introduce the Json library he added in. Which was probably why the pr was rejected Also my nips are wet