9 ms·
>In terms of performance/density Intel 4 should be in same ballpark as '4nm' of Samsung/TSMC. Any proofs to back that up?
by DeathArrow 3y ago
>In terms of performance/density Intel 4 should be in same ballpark as '4nm' of Samsung/TSMC.
Any proofs to back that up?
- smolder 3y agoIt is true that Intel was ahead of TSMC for transistor density relative to the "nm" labelling of their nodes, which is exactly why the naming was changed. Intel 10nm was roughly equivalent to TSMC 7nm in density. They aren't beating TSMC in real terms, though. Intel is still lagging after their embarrassing stall developing the 10nm node.