3 ms·
Sorry, but at the link you provided there is no model weights, only inferred images offered for examination, so at this point it is at vaporware stage compared
by diimdeep 3y ago
Sorry, but at the link you provided there is no model weights, only inferred images offered for examination, so at this point it is at vaporware stage compared to stable diffusion tools.
- godelski 3y agoSorry, you're right. That is a really weird thing to do. Just provide 6GB of images...? They even don't have an issues page. Looks to be a common thing by that author. You're right, very suspicious. Lafite has their checkpoints at least. Results aren't great, but it is small and fast. They have a colab but it's broken (lol). Fix by removing the torch versions, and add gdown. Replace the wget line with "!gdown https://drive.google.com/u/0/uc?id=17ER7Yl02Y6yCPbyWxK_tGrJ8RKkcieKq https://drive.google.com/u/0/uc?id=17ER7Yl02Y6yCPbyWxK_tGrJ8..." (checkpoint from from their github). Then everything will work fine. It took some time to get some decent outputs (but then again so did my first time with any diffusion model. This is definitely lower quality though). At least the authors look engaged in the github issues and do show how to get better results. (Always be suspicious of the images shown in papers... this one is certainly no exception) https://github.com/drboog/Lafite https://github.com/drboog/Lafite