4 ms·
> Also I don't understand how you could screw these things up repeatedly for so many features. Seems like a generic bug in the settings system which is fairly
by grok25 3y ago
> Also I don't understand how you could screw these things up repeatedly for so many features.
Seems like a generic bug in the settings system which is fairly complex. Pretty easy to see how something like that could happen.
- robcohen 3y agoI agree. It’s easy to see how a user hostile setting would go unchecked by a large corporate company that doesn’t benefit from protecting the privacy of its users.
- grok25 3y agoThat’s a weird conspiracy theory. How does anyone figure Apple benefits from this. How is the setting even ‘user hostile’?
- rkagerer 3y agoI consider sending anything up to the cloud without user's consent is pretty hostile. Passwords especially. I don't care if they claim it's E2EE; programmers and implementations are fallible and I thought a key part of Apple's whole value proposition is it's supposed to retain control in the user's hands.
- funcDropShadow 3y ago> I consider sending anything up to the cloud without user's consent is pretty hostile. If not illegal.
- Kbelicius 3y agoDo these "generic bugs" ever happen the other way around? Meaning, do they ever disable any form of communication to Apple or are they always enabling?