Mustn't Ring black holes also be fluid attractor system solutions? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38370118 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38370118

Mustn't Ring black holes also be fluid attractor system solutions? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38370118 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38370118 https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/ https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/ Ctrl-F "n-body" "Mathematicians Found 12,000 Solutions to the Notoriously Hard Three-Body Problem" (2023) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37959364 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37959364 https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/#comment-37959364 https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/#comment-37959364 : > Are all of the identified solutions (also) fluid attractor systems; and - if correct - shouldn't a theory of superfluid quantum gravity predict all of the n-body gravity solutions already discovered with non-fluidic numerical solutions? [...] > A sufficient theory of quantum gravity must describe n-body gravity within Bose-Einstein Condensates and also quantum levitation. ... > N-body gravity solutions with fluid vortices should predict all existing numerical n-body outcomes? > That so many things in space look fluidic - how many spiral arms are there on a nebula, [or a vortex due to a drain] all existing visual representations of black holes look like fluids, merging neutron stars look like emergent patterns from curl, too Shouldn't there be a corresponding solution with vorticity?