> What does that have to do with AI progress? AI, tech, etc. are all increasing continuously, getting better year after year. Who do you think is building the

> What does that have to do with AI progress? AI, tech, etc. are all increasing continuously, getting better year after year. Who do you think is building the AI? Even more importantly, if people become overly-reliant on AI (already early hints of this happening), human competency will decline. There's a tipping point on that curve where AI plateaus indefinitely as there's no one competent enough to work on it anymore. The speed we're traveling at on that curve is far faster than progress toward an organic intelligence. > What you're qualifying as AGI will require [...] I'm not qualifying it, that's the literal definition of AGI: https://archive.ph/eUgma https://archive.ph/eUgma > Which are all tech trends towards which billions of dollars are being poured and we are getting closer everyday. The amount of money you pour into a problem is meaningless. How it's solved (and why) is far more important. Resources !== solutions. If that heuristic were true, the world would be in a far better place.