> Why let them intervene? Because it would be the most sure-fire way to be certain that it actually gets done, whereas "the market" is less certain and prone t

> Why let them intervene? Because it would be the most sure-fire way to be certain that it actually gets done, whereas "the market" is less certain and prone to manipulation tactics such as lock-in. Returning to my original question that you kind of dodged, why not let them intervene?