3 ms·
> Good-looking managers also have greater chance of promotion and tend to move to small firms. The potential explanations for their underperformance include ina
by karaterobot 3y ago
> Good-looking managers also have greater chance of promotion and tend to move to small firms. The potential explanations for their underperformance include inadequate ability, insufficient effort, overconfidence and inefficient site visits.
This makes sense as a consequence of people's tendency to prefer attractive people, and seems related but not identical to the Peter principle. They'd tend to get responsibility unwarranted by their past performance because they're just so damned good looking!
Hmm, if this study has legs, maybe my next resume should highlight how ugly I am. And if I put a bag over my head during the interview, maybe they'll think I'm so hideous that I must truly be a genius.
* 16 years industry experience
* History of delivering blah blah
* Face looks like a mule kicked it
- purplecats 3y agoonly if they've read and internalized this paper
- mynameisnoone 3y agoI believe these biases to be the case. Consider an almost opposite signal - the US court system: unattractive, men, and minorities are given longer sentences. One risk to personal achievement is externally when too little is expected. It is especially tragic there is undiscovered, latent ability or a lack of appropriate confidence. A more ethical course is to refuse some offers and accolades, and never take things that are too easy. After adolescence, excellence must come from within regardless of difficulty level the world presents.