But as you said yourself the claim isn't 'open source', it's 'open', so...what do you want really? I understand this complaint (I get both sides really) when i

But as you said yourself the claim isn't 'open source', it's 'open', so...what do you want really? I understand this complaint (I get both sides really) when it's a non OSI licence being called 'open source', but you can't just start extending that to the single words 'open' and 'source' too. 'I don't know what "source available" means, because it certainly doesn't mean available under open source licence', etc.