3 ms·
Sure, but I don't think even Bender or Marcus would deny their potential for practical utility, right? I think they mean to say that LLMs are not exactly as mir
by lgessler 3y ago
Sure, but I don't think even Bender or Marcus would deny their potential for practical utility, right? I think they mean to say that LLMs are not exactly as miraculous as they might seem, and very capable of misbehavior.
- cbb330 3y agoyour mind also conjectures many unreasonable and illogical solutions to things. then separately your mind has an "evaluator" to deduce a set of solutions down to things that make sense. Is anyone saying LLMs in isolation and without contextual tooling are miraculous? Even the text box for chatGPT is a form of wrapping LLM in a UX that is incrementally more miraculous.
- janalsncm 3y agoBender and Marcus don’t get to decide what can be useful for people. LLMs are useful, although their imperfections limit their usefulness. But the bar for usefulness is a lot lower than “perfection”.