3 ms·
> for 2 years already ... All that has happened is they launched a very mid GPU Hardware development cycles are closer to 5 years. So while he might have gotte
by pgeorgi 3y ago
> for 2 years already ... All that has happened is they launched a very mid GPU
Hardware development cycles are closer to 5 years. So while he might have gotten some adjustments done on the designs so far, if he turned the ship around it'll take a while longer to materialize.
The software side is more agile, so any tea leave reading to discern what Gelsinger's strategy looks like is best done over there.
- jorvi 3y agoNot only that, for a “first” (not sure how much of Larrabee was salvaged) discrete GPU attempt, Intel Arc is fantastic. Look at the first GPUs Nvidia and ATI launched. It’s only when you put them up against Nvidia and AMDs comes-with-decades-of-experience offerings that Intel’s GPUs seem less than stellar.
- CuriousCosmic 3y agoYeah Arc is incredible in how much it accomplished as a first attempt and as long as they keep at it without chopping it up into a bunch of artificially limited market segments then it'll probably be incredibly competitive in a few generations.