exactly what was already said, systemic change. don’t go where you don’t support, rather than half-ass it. hopefully you can understand how, based upon having

exactly what was already said, systemic change. don’t go where you don’t support, rather than half-ass it. hopefully you can understand how, based upon having already explained that, it would be possible to make an assumption in good faith. since you didn’t seem to notice the first time, it would appear to be a passive rejection. shall we continue? assuming you also wanted to discuss in good faith. who wanted to argue?