3 ms·
This is because there is no formal way to run a QA org, people get hired and are told to “figure it out”. Then as other posters said the other orgs ignore the Q
by righthand 3y ago
This is because there is no formal way to run a QA org, people get hired and are told to “figure it out”. Then as other posters said the other orgs ignore the QA org because they have no understanding of the need. What you’re describing is a leadership problem, not a QA usefulness problem.