3 ms·

In this theory of computational bounds in nature, how did humans arise?

• bayindirh 3y ago
  Nature is a more complex and sophisticated machinery when compared to humans. If this bound didn't exist, universe can spontaneously create new universes. However, it can only create elements, stars, planets, galaxies, which are less sophisticated than the universe itself. So, even universe has an upper limit on its creative abilities.
  • myk9001 3y ago
    OK, in this theory of computational bounds in nature, how did the universe arise?
    • bayindirh 3y ago
      In all seriousness, this a question of great interest for me, too, and I'm playing with it for a quite some time. Trying to answer it or at least starting to search for the answer steered me to astronomy, thinking going deeper on that front may bring me closer to the answer, but it was a bit too much for my younger self, so I continued to dig that issue on a more casual level. This doesn't mean that I don't spend considerable amount of time thinking about it today, and will put that issue to rest any time soon. At the core, this kind of questioning brought me to here in life, and I'm not gonna let this side of mine to rest or whither and die.
  • johncolanduoni 3y ago
    By what mechanism would a universe spontaneously create a new universe? As a human, can I spontaneously create anything simpler than me? Also, under what theory of cosmology are you operating, and how do you determine when one thing is simpler than another? Under the Big Bang theory, the very early state of the universe (e.g. prior to initial nucleosynthesis) seems simpler to me than a galaxy.