3 ms·
I love Tailscale, but you are really then just substituting one company's remote access for another's. I'm quite certain that TS are more capable of creating a
by cmsj 3y ago
I love Tailscale, but you are really then just substituting one company's remote access for another's. I'm quite certain that TS are more capable of creating a secure system than Ubiquiti are, but still, the principle of not trusting others with access to your network, is violated by TS.
- SparkyMcUnicorn 3y agoIt works with Headscale. https://github.com/juanfont/headscale https://github.com/juanfont/headscale
- michaelnoguera 3y agoI agree that enabling any form of remote access controlled by a third party increases attack surface, but I also feel like Tailscale has earned more of my trust than other vendors with the quality of their past security responses. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33695886 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33695886 (If anyone has examples of Tailscale incidents ending badly please share and I’ll update my trust accordingly, but to date I haven’t heard any.)
- fragmede 3y agoThat incident ended badly for anyone that had a Windows box and got 0wned. Tailscale's response was good, but my trust in the software they produce was damaged by that incident. I'm a current Tailscale user (esp with their AppleTV app), but that incident wasn't good.