Let me frame this in a story: Dave is a prostitute. He is hired by Sue via contract. In this contract, Dave agrees to have sex with Sue. Also in the contract i

Let me frame this in a story: Dave is a prostitute. He is hired by Sue via contract. In this contract, Dave agrees to have sex with Sue. Also in the contract is the agreement that Sue may introduce any sex toys that will not physically harm Dave. When they get together, Dave notices a camera pointed at them. Sue tells Dave that, "I only record sex with people who consent to my use of a camera." Later, Dave learns that Sue did in fact record the encounter. Sue's defense? The camera was a sex toy! It didn't physically harm you! This was all in the contract! Is Sue's defense valid? Of course not! Sue has committed fraud. --- We should hold corporations every bit as accountable as we would fictional prostitutes.