4 ms·
The majority of the article is doing touch up work to a woman, which is a very common task. There is nothing sexist about this work, and it's idiotic to claim
by watty 15y ago
The majority of the article is doing touch up work to a woman, which is a very common task. There is nothing sexist about this work, and it's idiotic to claim so.
- factorizer 15y agothat would be a valid reason, if the author of the article actually was working on touch up work of the pictured female. somehow i have the suspicion that no: he chose it on purpose, because, you know: BOOBS!
- lukejduncan 15y agoWhy have the main picture a shot of cleavage? He doesn't touch up the cleavage anywhere in the picture. If he did, it'd probably make for a pretty weird demo. The point of the picture was to illustrate the single window mode. It seems like there would be a common sense test where you think: "Is this really how I want to represent myself and this software?"
- watty 15y agoIt's a female in a bathing suit! There's nothing sleazy about touching up a female or male in photo editing software. In fact, these are probably two of the most common things touched up for photo work.
- nicubunu 15y agonot even a bathing suit, she is wearing a corset http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/2012/04/siamb-2012-denisa.html http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/2012/04/siamb-2012-denisa.html