3 ms·
as it does for real people - especially those that are on their phones while they drive. FSD doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be consistently bette
by ejb999 3y ago
as it does for real people - especially those that are on their phones while they drive.
FSD doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be consistently better than the typical/average driver and cause or get into less accidents than real people do.
That day is coming - it may be TSLA, it might be someone else, but sooner or later you won't even be able to afford the insurance for a car that is powered by a human if FSD provably is safer in agrregate.
- idopmstuff 3y agoYep, this is it. It's why it's such a shame about the Cruise incident in SF - people act like it's shocking that an autonomous vehicle didn't do the correct thing when a human driven vehicle launched a person into their windshield. Of course it's terrible that the car drove over the person (and unacceptable that Cruise tried to conceal that fact), but in terms of thinking about the safety of the vehicle you really have to ask yourself whether humans would be able to handle that situation well. Would I definitely react in the optimal way if a person hit my windshield? I wouldn't bet on it, and I would say there is a nontrivial likelihood that I would accidentally step on the gas and run over the person. That's just the nature of dealing with a truly one in a million situation that I'm totally unprepared for (just as the autonomous car was totally unprepared for it).