5 ms·
The good old it’s for the children position.
by cebert 3y ago
The good old it’s for the children position.
- captainkrtek 3y agoPick one of: - National Security - Protect the kids
- enasterosophes 3y agoDon't forget: - Money launderers - Contraband distributors
- sgift 3y agoEvil people are out to get YOU or YOUR KIDS. Give us access, we protect you! There. I generalized it. :(
- enasterosophes 3y agoAh, when the powers of the Four Horsemen combine!
- munk-a 3y agoYou wouldn't steal a car!
- pookha 3y agoSTAY SAFE!
- barbazoo 3y agoExcept that in this instance I can actually see the merit but obviously YMMV. I had access to porn since as far back as I can remember. In hindsight I wish something like this had been in place.
- nmz 3y agoI also always had access to it but I never saw the harm in it, always knew it was unrealistic, the same way an action movie is. FWIW Instead of protections that will be eventually breakable, What I would like is more a mandatory disclaimer saying that everything about it is unrealistic and that its pure entertainment.
- snarf21 3y agoDon't forget that this was once considered pornography: https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/woman-ticket-wearing-bikini-1957/ https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/woman-ticket-wearing-bikini... Who will watch the watchers?
- barbazoo 3y agoThe populace electing lawmakers.
- red-iron-pine 3y ago"the best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter"
- jstarfish 3y ago> Who will watch the watchers? The voyeurs.
- kredd 3y agoAlso grew up with unrestricted internet access, I recall everyone in middle/high school sharing LiveLeak links through MSN. Sure, it desensitized us, maybe “survivor bias”, but if I quickly think of everyone I know, we’ve all ended up as semi-functioning adults. What I’d rather see governments do — figure out how to solve decreasing attention span in kids. They’ll eventually watch porn anyways, but tolerating anything that lasts more than 5 minutes is more important.
- ipaddr 3y agoIf it did, the question is would you still be opposed? Is hiding knowledge better than allowing it? I think without knowledge you might have the opposite opinion