3 ms·
Back to the 20s and 30s at least, when they ran glowing coverage of the USSR's forced collectivization, ignoring the resulting mass famines and megadeaths. The
by purpleflame1257 3y ago
Back to the 20s and 30s at least, when they ran glowing coverage of the USSR's forced collectivization, ignoring the resulting mass famines and megadeaths. The NYT would be better served as a one page crossword sheet with wedding announcements on the back.
- 303uru 3y agoLol, the wedding announcements. A family friend who started what's essentially an SSO for education got a glowing wedding announcement and I found it so embarrassing. Who cares?
- meowface 3y agoThey did apologize for that: https://www.nytco.com/company/prizes-awards/new-york-times-statement-about-1932-pulitzer-prize-awarded-to-walter-duranty/ https://www.nytco.com/company/prizes-awards/new-york-times-s... It's still completely inexcusable, but I think they understand how wrong it was.