>>How are you ever going to know what happened there? if only there was a recording device to record what actually happened.... >>You can assume the cop was c

>>How are you ever going to know what happened there? if only there was a recording device to record what actually happened.... >>You can assume the cop was corrupt and the citizen innocent in all those cases, yes that is exactly how it should work, that is how the system is setup to work. We have some how flipped that in recent years. At all times you should assume the government is abusing you, unless they can prove they are not. No video, I side with the people not the government >>There has to be a fraction of cases where their rights were not being violated as claimed and footage is still unavailable. Whether that is 1/10 or 9/10 It would be an error rate far far far far far less than that, and when you factor in most calls have more than one officers, plus patrol cars that have their own recording devices, plus citizen witnesses, plus business surveillance I think we get to such an unlikely circumstance to be statically impossible