2 ms·
You're wrong! /Sarcasm Seriously, there's also destructive arguments where you know you're not changing the other arguer's viewpoint, but instead aiming to cha
by pierat 3y ago
You're wrong! /Sarcasm
Seriously, there's also destructive arguments where you know you're not changing the other arguer's viewpoint, but instead aiming to change onlookers's views.
There's also other types of destructive arguments to maintain standing in a community. For example, if someone comes in on a liberal area and starts talking terrible of trans people. The 'argument' is in part a required demonstration to show everyone else you're serious about maintaining the status quo. The argument will never fix the person, but that wasn't the goal either. It's more of a filibuster with aim to make the other person to leave.
Abortion is one such. Gun rights, another. Socialized medicine as well. Taxation.
I've never been too sure the effectiveness of the destructive argument, but that form really took hold on pre-musk Twitter.
- suoduandao3 3y agoDestructive arguments can also have the benefit of strengthening the arguer, like sparring in a gym makes me more confident in a dive bar. I wrote my first book after months of habitually arguing on a mongolian basket weaving forum and deciding to put that energy towards a project. I'd never have started the project without building the habit of passionately writing at a certain time of day.