>It's then only "silent sabotage" to the extent that said docs were ignored. From what I've read, the maintenance company did scour all documentation and found

>It's then only "silent sabotage" to the extent that said docs were ignored. From what I've read, the maintenance company did scour all documentation and found no explanation for why the train was disabled. It was an entirely undocumented feature. Maybe they were just lying, but this idea you have in your head that it was just a fly-by-night operation who couldn't be bothered to read the documentation is contradicted by the available public record.