4 ms·
I'm not sure I follow when you say "it's not impossible". I would rephrase that as "it's useful", as is it's productive to work with the tools we have. But in
by pantulis 3y ago
I'm not sure I follow when you say "it's not impossible". I would rephrase that as "it's useful", as is it's productive to work with the tools we have.
But in the end we all know that new physics need to be developed because the assumption is that there is only one reality and thus we should strive to reach a unifying theoretical model. Or are you suggesting there it is not possible to achieve a single theoretical model of reality?
- philipov 3y agoWell, the thing I was originally suggesting was that people should not be so quick to call something unfalsifiable just because GR predicts we can't directly look inside black holes.