3 ms·
this is a good place for the state to help in the crypto asset space, package maintenance and approval. it wouldn't be mandatory, just allow the market to choos
by yieldcrv 3y ago
this is a good place for the state to help in the crypto asset space, package maintenance and approval. it wouldn't be mandatory, just allow the market to choose between the public-private partnership packages, and non-standard ones. people could vet products based on it passing certain criteria, and then if that criteria fails anyway there is an easier path of tracking accountability
- Geisterde 3y agoIs this supposed to be a joke? That is among a short list of very bad things you dont want to happen. Yea, the government can help steal your money, they are the pros afterall, maybe they can even provision their own cryptocurrency, its called slavery coin. The "crypto industry" has plenty of quality products to pick from, they just need to accept that none of them save for bitcoin has security. People will have to learn the hard way.
- yieldcrv 3y agostrawman arguments aim to discredit one concept by introducing concepts nobody ever suggested which is what you wrote
- Geisterde 3y agoOf course you didnt suggest it, that is the logical conclusion of the government getting involved in custody.
- yieldcrv 3y agobut i didn’t say a single thing about custody my entire comment was about package management and nested software dependencies, what did you even read
- Geisterde 3y agoRight, the government can be expected to remain totally neutral, theyll never abuse their power, who would ever do such a thing?