3 ms·
I wonder whether you have any data to back up your claim, but other data seem to contradict it. Also see the comment of Luke Lambert on this thread https://gis
by sinuhe69 3y ago
I wonder whether you have any data to back up your claim, but other data seem to contradict it.
Also see the comment of Luke Lambert on this thread
https://gist.github.com/LukeLambert/dd722e49bc773bcb27e859d9dbcc6615 https://gist.github.com/LukeLambert/dd722e49bc773bcb27e859d9...
- turquoisevar 3y agoDo you have a link to the other data? I’m looking at Lambert’s data, but aside from the problem of sample size, it seems to support the FCC’s reading of the situation. There are barely any samples that hit the required >= 20Mbps up and while it’s easier to spot >= 100Mbps down, it’s far from consistent and seems to be more of a “once a day” occurrence.
- inemesitaffia 3y agoIn 2025 and in areas covered by RDOF. Not everywhere
- mortos 3y agoI suggest reviewing this data again, especially with the understanding that the timestamps are in UTC. 0027 UTC corresponds to 1827 in CST (the timezone for Texas). During prime time, this user was often around 10mbps.