3 ms·
I mean, I only know of the test at the time of the 6.4RC: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2305210-NE-2305205NE89 https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2305210
by jorvi 3y ago
I mean, I only know of the test at the time of the 6.4RC: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2305210-NE-2305205NE89 https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2305210-NE-2305205NE89
An increase in performance of 10-30% across "real" workloads. Just for changing one line (well, two lines including disabling p-state drivers)? I'll take it.
I would say its not a strange position to assume it has been improved further since then.
What would be interesting although niche is checking how iGPU's perform alongside it. I know that on Intel, "thermald" lowers iGPU performance because it improves CPU utilization and thus leaves less mW for the iGPU. Perhaps something similar will happen with EEVDF.