I don't disagree per se. But if you've read "The War of Art" then you realize Rubin's editor(s) did him, did all of us, a disservice. Yes, it doesn't have to b

I don't disagree per se. But if you've read "The War of Art" then you realize Rubin's editor(s) did him, did all of us, a disservice. Yes, it doesn't have to be read cover to cover. But some chapters could have been removed and "the work" would have gotten stronger. Ironic since that's a practice he champions. I'd recommend "The War of Art" over "Creative Act".