You're right. But you will note that the point of my response had one objective to prove this statement: "All innovation is composition plus random genera

You're right. But you will note that the point of my response had one objective to prove this statement: "All innovation is composition plus random generation." The poster asked for "evidence" behind this statement and I explained to him why what I said is true. There's still "magic" involved with human intelligence but it still has basis in reality and I can use that basis to prove certain statements. That's all I was doing.