> Windows licensing fees were cost prohibitive for the long term viability of the service Good that nothing threatens that long term viability Btw, why not of

> Windows licensing fees were cost prohibitive for the long term viability of the service Good that nothing threatens that long term viability Btw, why not offer both? Windows to grow the initial catalogue faster since breadth and depth are critical, and than phase it out to save on licensing costs when enough is ported to Linux?