3 ms·

I should clarify that LuaJIT is not universally used either, because LuaJIT doesn't support anything after Lua 5.1 among other reasons. People often claim that

• whizzter 3y ago
  It DIDN'T because Mike Pall(LuaJIT author) was on a hiatus from develoment. He's resumed work since and many 5.2+ features has been incorporated now even if the biggest language-turd (1: _ENV) is explicitly incompatible. The problem is that _ENV explicitly exposes the lexical environment as regular objects prohibiting optimizations, even JavaScript has _removed_ a similar feature (2: the with statement) when running in "strict" mode to simplify optimizations. LuaJIT _could_ implement the _ENV blocks but it'd seep into large parts of the codebase as ugly special cases that'd slow down all code in related contexts (thus possibly breaking much performance for code in seemingly unrelated places to where _ENV exists). To compare from an implementation optimization perspective, exposing _ENV is actually __worse__ than what CPython has with the GIL for example. Luckily "with"-statements in JS was seldomly used so implementers ignored it's existence as long as it's not used(but still have to consider it in implementations, thus adding more workload), but it's an wart that will kill many optimizations if used. For most practical purposes most people are fine without "with" or _ENV and the languages are fast enough. https://luajit.org/extensions.html https://luajit.org/extensions.html https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Strict_mode https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...