> This is some pretty poor philosophy Did you spend any time/compute in the massive hyperlinked space underlying this part? 1. Whatever the hell Leibniz was t

> This is some pretty poor philosophy Did you spend any time/compute in the massive hyperlinked space underlying this part? 1. Whatever the hell Leibniz was thinking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_ratiocinator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_ratiocinator a) If so, how confident are you that you understood it, on a scale of 1 to 10? b) If you did not, why did you not? c) Do you know what Leibniz was talking about? Because it may be a good question. (Or, it may not be.) > This kind of seems like... Speaking of philosophy: have you any interest in what it is? > where people confuse People are indeed silly. One problem with silliness is, it tends to render the patient unable to accurately self-diagnose.