3 ms·
This is some pretty poor philosophy... or philosophy of science. This kind of seems like the common mistake where people confuse the stories about science as th
by zanderwohl 3y ago
This is some pretty poor philosophy... or philosophy of science. This kind of seems like the common mistake where people confuse the stories about science as the science itself. It seems to be fitting a lot of metaphors together as its evidence.
- mistermann 3y ago> This is some pretty poor philosophy Did you spend any time/compute in the massive hyperlinked space underlying this part? 1. Whatever the hell Leibniz was thinking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_ratiocinator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_ratiocinator a) If so, how confident are you that you understood it, on a scale of 1 to 10? b) If you did not, why did you not? c) Do you know what Leibniz was talking about? Because it may be a good question. (Or, it may not be.) > This kind of seems like... Speaking of philosophy: have you any interest in what it is? > where people confuse People are indeed silly. One problem with silliness is, it tends to render the patient unable to accurately self-diagnose.