4 ms·
Not to mention we're not just stochastic parrots and monkeys on typewriters. We have reasoning. They can try to emulate it by putting ever more parameters but t
by Veliladon 3y ago
Not to mention we're not just stochastic parrots and monkeys on typewriters. We have reasoning. They can try to emulate it by putting ever more parameters but the reason we have nonsensical things like hallucinations is because they can't filter the output through reason before it comes out. Look at the lawyers getting caught with their pants down on ChatGPT. It's not actually reasoning a citation, it's just bullshitting what a citation might look like because a legal brief de novo needs to come from a place of reason.
- lacrimacida 3y agoThe imitation will get closer and closer to reasoning and some will mistake it for superior reasoning. I don’t think it’s impossible for computers to reason in analogous ways to us but the current road alone is not it, in my opinion. I think for artificial intelligence to florish it should have some form of artificial life to it, some system with a bit more complexity and feedback loops than anything that I know of today.