3 ms·

> What more could browser makers have done to encourage RSS? Technophiles love it, but the mass market rejected it. I mostly agree, but... Browsers prominentl

by dwc 15y ago

> What more could browser makers have done to encourage RSS? Technophiles love it, but the mass market rejected it. I mostly agree, but... Browsers prominently featured RSS for many years, and the world at large ignored it. Heck, I'm one of those technophiles and I ignored it in the browser. Why? Because RSS should have been about convenience, but the browser implementations did not seem intuitive, and more importantly did not make it clear how it actually worked. All the techies I know who regularly consume content through RSS use a separate reader, and I suggest that's because browser RSS did not actually offer anything compelling (or even useful at all). I could be totally wrong about how useful browser RSS was, but then the problem is that even a moderately competent techie didn't see it and the buck still stops at the browser.

gvb 15y ago
Ditto for finding the browser implementations useless. I did use Thunderbird for years, though. The irony is that I'm now using GoogleReader in a browser on my smartphone (Android) to read RSS feeds. I still have some feeds into my Thunderbird configuration, but mostly ignore them there. I tried the Google RSS feed reader app (Android) and didn't like it. I have not tried other RSS apps, the web-based GoogleReader meets my needs (I have a personal policy to minimize the number of install apps).
Tomis 15y ago
> but the browser implementations did not seem intuitive You might be using the wrong browser. With Opera you get a very elegant interface and can easily handle tens of thousands of entries (best part is you can read your stories offline if the website gives them to you). I have a good bunch of ArsTechnica stored on my hdd.