I hate the article is using DRM as explanation. It has nothing to do with DRM or anything with preventing software from being tampered with. It was parts of so

I hate the article is using DRM as explanation. It has nothing to do with DRM or anything with preventing software from being tampered with. It was parts of software included by producer to make 3rd party shops look incapable of servicing. Placed there in a sneaky way. DRM makes it look like official documented tampering prevention - article itself is good. Use of DRM in title and in article is just wrong.