> Lack of proven renewable hydrogen is an argument that would also rule out nuclear. I don't think so. We just built a new plant in Georgia. Minnesota's power

> Lack of proven renewable hydrogen is an argument that would also rule out nuclear. I don't think so. We just built a new plant in Georgia. Minnesota's power grid is already 1/4 nuclear. We've done it before, we can do it again. It would be nice to get costs down, but it's not a requirement. The only thing stopping us is political will and US's general inability to accomplish big things. Hydrogen storage isn't here today (but I hope it will be soon!), nuclear is.