>This bike share scheme is only possible because the city traded away its outdoor ad space. I get what you mean, but arguments like this confuse the underlying

>This bike share scheme is only possible because the city traded away its outdoor ad space. I get what you mean, but arguments like this confuse the underlying issue of how we value and price things. It's certainly not "only possible" that way. It makes me think of the Mark Fisher line “It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.”