3 ms·
This is shitty equity too though, I can't ride bikes but I still have to look at your ads and make do with worse economies of scale for public transportation th
by Y_Y 3y ago
This is shitty equity too though, I can't ride bikes but I still have to look at your ads and make do with worse economies of scale for public transportation that's accesible to the disabled. If bike share is a public good. It should be paid for out of public funds, if the city decides to sell advertising rights in public spaces then it can. Those two ideas need not be linked, money is fungible!
- celestialcheese 3y agoIf public funds pay for it, you personally (assuming you pay taxes) are also paying for the program, but this time with real dollars instead of attention. > money is fungible What?
- Espressosaurus 3y agoMoney can be moved.
- celestialcheese 3y agoFrom where? You might live in a flush city, with lots of extra discretionary $$ flowing around, but most cities in the US are nearly bankrupt, and leveraged to the hilt on providing basic services. This is the definition of a "luxury belief", thinking the average city can just find money and put it towards removing ads that pay for services.
- Y_Y 3y agoBut I don't want to sell my attention! At least not at the crappy valuation the bike advertisers offer. Money being fungible means that one dollar is as good as another. It all goes in a big pile for the budget. In other words, you don't have to match up your revenue sources with your costs (like bikes with advertising), though this is frequently used for the purpose of trying to justify one thing or another.
- renewiltord 3y agoThese are assertions but that's insufficient to make policy. To make policy you often need to tie things together because constituencies will want to keep net costs low as they trial programs.