4 ms·
You don't need ads for that, it could just be art. You could enjoy vibrant artistic billboards without anyone trying to shove products down your throat. Ever t
by pastacacioepepe 3y ago
You don't need ads for that, it could just be art. You could enjoy vibrant artistic billboards without anyone trying to shove products down your throat.
Ever thought of that?
- massysett 3y agoWho is going to pay for them?
- j_maffe 3y agoWe will pay for them (through governmental taxes) instead of the advertised products that the advertisements get us to pay for. It's a net-win for the community.
- pastacacioepepe 3y agoIt's funny how nobody ever asks this question when the topic is military spending.
- massysett 3y agoMilitary is a wee bit more necessary than getting rid of billboards, just ask Ukraine.
- pastacacioepepe 3y ago[flagged]
- massysett 3y agoExactly, and while you’re at it, add a few more million to get rid of billboards - money that could have been spent on hunger, or health.
- dantyti 3y agoThe consumer is paying for the ads in the end. This just cuts out the grifters in the middle.