3 ms·
It's good for you to provide the link. The problem is that people will follow the link and read it. It says, paraphrasing, "The commission's reasoning is attra
by troupo 3y ago
It's good for you to provide the link. The problem is that people will follow the link and read it.
It says, paraphrasing, "The commission's reasoning is attractive, but doesn't hold water. Why are we requiring Space X to meet its 2025 deadline three years earlier. The arguments are thin, and I'm appalled by the situation."
Nowhere does the opinion mention, allude to, imply, or call out whatever you think it does.
- fastball 3y agoYep, as other comments have pointed out, I accidentally linked the wrong one (105A3 instead of 105A2). This one starts with "I wholeheartedly agree with the entirety of Commissioner Carr’s dissent". Carr's dissent goes into more detail that he thinks this is the Biden administration going after Musk for not playing ball.