3 ms·
In fairness, training machine learning models is definitely one of areas where only running when it’s cheap to run makes some amount of sense. It’s something yo
by NineStarPoint 3y ago
In fairness, training machine learning models is definitely one of areas where only running when it’s cheap to run makes some amount of sense. It’s something you want done eventually, not something that is responding to an immediate need.
In practice…yeah. The machine’s your running your models on are expensive, the people working on the model waiting extra time to check the new model are expensive, and not keeping up with your competitors because you only work half the time is not generally a wise choice for someone like Microsoft.
I have worked for a smaller company that trained a model on AWS when spot instances were cheap…until they got large enough to purchase some hardware best suited to their use case that could run almost constantly, then doing everything except training their model in the cloud. So yeah I also doubt this makes sense in practice.
- pfdietz 3y agoThe cost of supplying the servers with renewables 90% of the time would be much cheaper than supplying them 100% of the time. The former can easily be done with some batteries; the latter requires more extensive consideration of rare dark-calm periods. Another consideration is that servers can be located in the best places for renewables, not in places with high seasonal variability and relatively low winds.