4 ms·

Obviously it’s a lottery to the BABY. This is straightforward Rawls-liberalism.

• thaumasiotes 3y ago
  > Obviously it’s a lottery to the BABY. You say that like the same baby might conceivably have been born into more than one potential family. But the opposite is true: examine any baby and you'll find that there's only one possible set of parents they can have, barring identical twins.
  • avgcorrection 3y ago
    Oh my god. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/original-position/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/original-position/
    • thaumasiotes 3y ago
      Are you saying that the family it is born into is a lottery to the baby, or that you wish we would pretend that it is?
      • avgcorrection 3y ago
        I’m saying that you are being deliberately obtuse. Or something worse.
• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]